Blogs

Revising a research paper can feel overwhelming, especially with reviewer comments. The key is separating problems from tasks. Problems involve high-level issues like unclear arguments or weak theory, while tasks are actionable edits like adding citations or clarifying text. By focusing on problems first, graduate students, professors, and academic writers can revise more effectively and improve their chances of journal publication.

By the end of page 1 we’ve passed two of them. Don’t leave these critical junctions to chance! Across top business journals, reviewers and editors will say they evaluate the whole submission—and most do. But that evaluation may be only a minor aspect of their decision to reject or accept a paper. In fact, research suggests over 90% of our decision-making is subconscious (not that this is always a bad thing). Here’s what I’ve noticed as an editor to business school faculty for

When reviewers say ‘unclear contribution,’ they often mean your paper lacks direction.

You already know that great writing is critical to your own success as an academic. What you might not realize is just how much influence you have over your students’ career success, based on what you teach (or don’t teach) them about writing. When it comes to the vast majority of academic writing, it’s a classic case of the lost leading the lost. Very few business PhDs include effective training on writing, so the skill (or lack thereof) essentially follows an apprenticeship