top of page
Blogs
Search


Michel and Louise: Stalled for 6 Years → Accepted in 6 Weeks
Discover how strategic academic editing helped a management professor publish A-tier journal articles, accelerate promotion, and maintain research momentum during major life challenges.
Jul 218 min read


Why Technically Strong Papers Still Fail: Decoding Reviewer Intuition
What determines whether your paper gets accepted at a top journal?
Ask most business professors that question and you’ll get some familiar answers: strong theoretical contribution, methodological rigor, robust findings, and alignment with the journal’s scope.
Jul 714 min read


How to Write a Response Letter That Wins Over Reviewers in 3 Steps: The GAP Framework
While journal articles make up the vast majority of what we edit at CS Phares, they’re closely followed by another type of document, especially at this time of year: response letters. The power of a great response letter is almost on par with that of a great manuscript itself in terms of securing acceptance at your target journal. Over years of working with faculty through this process, I’ve seen brilliant scholars undersell their revisions with defensive or dismissive respon
Jun 2311 min read


Hate writing? Don’t turn to AI—here’s a better way, in 3 simple steps
“I hate writing… should I leave academia?” “How can I be good at something I really don’t like? Every minute of it is a struggle.” These were two separate responses I heard from two clients when I assured them that, as assistant business professors, they were now essentially professional writers. Both had reached out to me because they lacked confidence in this critical aspect of a successful career in academia. Both had expected that I’d give them frameworks and information
May 268 min read
bottom of page