Blogs

Revising a research paper can feel overwhelming, especially with reviewer comments. The key is separating problems from tasks. Problems involve high-level issues like unclear arguments or weak theory, while tasks are actionable edits like adding citations or clarifying text. By focusing on problems first, graduate students, professors, and academic writers can revise more effectively and improve their chances of journal publication.

Discover how strategic academic editing helped a management professor publish A-tier journal articles, accelerate promotion, and maintain research momentum during major life challenges.

By the end of page 1 we’ve passed two of them. Don’t leave these critical junctions to chance! Across top business journals, reviewers and editors will say they evaluate the whole submission—and most do. But that evaluation may be only a minor aspect of their decision to reject or accept a paper. In fact, research suggests over 90% of our decision-making is subconscious (not that this is always a bad thing). Here’s what I’ve noticed as an editor to business school faculty for

How 13 Years of Strategic Editing Turned Complex Research Into Leadership and Impact Customer Starting Point Benjamin and I first met in 2011, when his program coordinator referred him to me for dissertation edits.  Unlike the vast majority of the documents I edit, dissertations present serious restrictions for editing: because the writing itself constitutes a key part of earning a degree, it can’t be altered in any significant way. So at first, my job was limited to catching